| Address: | Chennai, Tamil Nadu |
TO
THE VICE CHANCELLOR,
Respected sir,
we students have been grevied very much for the acts of our prestegious institution in the name of revaluation(reval).In the examinations held during april-may 2010, our results on a certain subject was very poor. we were failed with very low marks. we then applied for revaluation with photo copy. it was very much evident from our photo copies that the paper scored 62 marks. hence i was very confident that my revauation results would be on tha positive side. but the results were NC. The whole of my class whom ever applied for revaluation in this paper were rendered with NC as the revaluation results.. i like to ask a few questions based upon these results:
1. how is it that a group of around 15 to 20 students of the same college were rendered with NC in the same subject?
2.When the paper is being submitted for second correction (reval correction), the first time correction marks are to be teared away from the answer sheets and an entirely new valuation is done by another valuator, so how come the second valuator also exactly suggests the same marks as the first one?( and that too for a large group of people )
3.annauniversity exams doesnot follow an objective based examination patterns inorder to provide exactly same marks from two different valuators .
4.if a paper of such kind gets cleared in the review, then wat is the meaning of the previous two corrections? and does a world renowned univeristy requires so many attempts to evaluate a paper?
5.if the criteria posed on point number 2. is not possible, then on what basis are these NC being released as results? Can we assume that the university relases the results without correcting all of the papers and marks those un corrected papers as NC papers?
6. if the above condition is true then what is the value for the student who pays so much of money for the sake of revaluation??
these complains are very truthful and they spoil the name of the world renowned university.
the name of the subject: EC1352- Antenna and wave propogation Was this information helpful? | 
All the staff attending the revaluation has a mindset of saving the staff who corrected the paper previously.is that justice ? we from a college prepared well and wrote a tedious paper well and expected good results . but all were failed . how come all the 30 candidates attending the exam would fail. pls for god sake keep in mind that THE STUDENTS WRITING ARREARS ARE NOT FOOLS AND APPEAR FOR EXAM FOR SAKE . pls valuate the papers seriously . hell!