Comments
sir. hum na 2009 ma Rs-115000 om sai company ma laga tha.pur hamara.2cheque he bouns ho gaya tha.plz hama batha jay.ke hamara pasya mela ga ke nahi..
I am totaly agree with Mr.Shah those women ang some person made you all fool ang created a drama may be somebody paid them money for that or they are making money they are smart and we are fool to listen to them if you peope are clever the understang now till there is a time to re correct our mistake wake up dont listen to others...
wake up...there is time...
wake up...there is time...
I am concerned about our money. I have invested in four of the schemes and Just wanted to know when soon can we start receiving our money back. As far as stories goes, if thats true then why there are no cases against them.
Maine dated25/09/2009 ko resorts scheem me 149000/- rs. ka investment sosn me kiya tha.nov2009 se maine koi bhi rupya nahi prapt kiya hai. sosn ke sab office dec.2009 se band hai .pata nahi hum logo ka rupya milega ya isi tarah log bevakoof banate rahenge. kyoki koi sahi bat nahi bata raha hai. isse fir/comp badhte jayenge taha sosn/roopesh verma ko bahar nikalne me badi dikkat hogi.
People should understand that companies with same profile like AIM limozines, AIM MOTORS can not operate now. Since such investments are against RBI norms & Shree Om Sai Nath Car on rent ltd is also closed for the same reasons.
Wish u all the best..I came to know that Metro Cruise is making settlements for the principle amount of the investors
Wish u all the best..I came to know that Metro Cruise is making settlements for the principle amount of the investors
Any company can operate without the permission of RBI till the time they do not denote amount received by them as deposit or investment, It is as per the latest meeting of SEBI, RBI & MCA.
Every company has the right to share its profit or can give compensation, contract rent and can act on the behalf of the investor based on the contract & agreement/MOU. Which was done by sosn & the business model does not have any fault in it unless & until the company commits fraud by swindling of funds with nexus with any body or siphon off the funds taken for some purpose to other activities not in agreement/contract. And there are many businesses which have a average return of 10-15% pm but an appropriate professional approach & investors centric agenda has to be followed to perform which as a single man operation by Mr. Verma was completely mismanaged in Sosn.
Hope the investors take over sosn & rerun it to the satisfaction of all.
Every company has the right to share its profit or can give compensation, contract rent and can act on the behalf of the investor based on the contract & agreement/MOU. Which was done by sosn & the business model does not have any fault in it unless & until the company commits fraud by swindling of funds with nexus with any body or siphon off the funds taken for some purpose to other activities not in agreement/contract. And there are many businesses which have a average return of 10-15% pm but an appropriate professional approach & investors centric agenda has to be followed to perform which as a single man operation by Mr. Verma was completely mismanaged in Sosn.
Hope the investors take over sosn & rerun it to the satisfaction of all.
I had made an investment in the said concern. I am an officer of the Indian Army. We have been protecting our national borders serving at an altitude of more than 3000 mt.above the msl and trying to save this hard earned money and to add to it we make investments or save the money with the banks where from the return is too low. After looking ito the lucrative offer of Om Sai Nath the hard earned money was invested but after 2 moths the flow of monthly return stopped abruptly. Therefore, I would request the Om Sai Nath administration to restore the blocked flow of return as perb the agreement
TO ALL MY INVESTOR FRIEND'S ACROSS INDIDIA,
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO FIND JUSTICE THROUGH SUPREME COURT VIA HIGH COURT.
LATEST INFORMATION OF COURT HEARING ON 7th JAN 2011
The Hon'ble Magistrate Mr. Amit Bansal Additional City Matropolian Magistrate Patiyala House Court at Newe Delhi has cancelled the bail of Mr. Amit Verma ( Chairman of SOSN) as he could not deposite the
amount which was 10 to 40 cores as ordered by Hon, ble Session Judge Mr. S.P.Garg. In my view it was good because if he had deposited the amount than this money is to be distributed amongst Delhi Investor Only & other investor across India remain kept on waiting waiting & waithing. So my dear friend, s dont waste the time and join hands to fight case in Supreme Court because the verdict given by Hon, ble Supreme court will be a binding on every court if India. Now its upto you?
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
AS ON 13 SEPT 2010 THE HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. S P GARG PATIYALA COURT NEW DELHI, HAS GRANTED CONDITIONAL BAIL TO MR. AMIT VERMA CHAIRMAN OF SOSN CO .TO DEPOSITE 10 TO 40 CR..MORE WITHIN 25 DAY'S SO THAT IT COULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONG THE DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY.
WILL IT BE A JUSTICE ON THE PART OF OTHER INVESTOR'S ACCROSS INDIA?. THE MONEY WHICH WILL BE DEPOSITED BY MR. AMIT VERMA BELONG'S TO ALL INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THEN HOW IT CAN BE UTILIZED TO CLEAR THE DUES OF DELHI INVESTOR'S ONLY ?.
IN MY VIEW IT WILL BE A SHEER INJUSTICE . SO MY DEAR INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA THIS DECISION NEED'S TO BE CHALLENGED BEFORE HON'BLE HIGH COURT TO GET A STAY ORDER AGAINST THIS UNFAIR DISTRIBUTION OF MONEY PASSEWD BY HON'BLE SESSION JUDGE MR. SP GARG AT DELHI COURT.
NO TIME IS LEFT & IF STILL WE WILL WAIT THAN NOTHING WILL BE IN OUR HAND.
WHEN MR, RUPESH VERMA M.D AND HIS PREVIOUS ADVOCATE MR.DHARMENDRA ARYA HAS ADMITTED BEFORE THE COURT ON[protected] THAT THE BANK A/C, DOCUMENT'S, AND DATA FED IN COMPUTERS WAS RECOVERES BY POLICE AND EOW FROM HIS DELHI AND GURGAON OFFICE THAN WHY IT COULD NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE COURT ? IT SHOW'S SOME MALAFIDE INTENSION.
IN MY VIEW AFTER GETTING THE TOTAL DATA OF ALL INVESTOR ACCROSS INDIA AND THE ASSET'S OF THE COMPANY SHOULD BE EVALUATED AND AFTER THAT A LAWFUL DECISION POLICY CAN BE DECIDED FOR ALL CRYING INVESTOR'S ACROSS INDIA.
SHRI ON SAI NATH CAR ON RENT AND HIS SISTEISR CONCERN'S IS A GROUP OF PUBLIC LTD. CO. NOT A SHOP WHICH IS ONLY CONFINED TO NEW DELHI ONLY? SO MY DEAR ALL INVESTOR'S AWOKE, ARISE AND DO NOT STOP TILL THE GOAL IS REACHED. REMEDY IS TO FIND JUSTICE THROUGH SUPREME COURT VIA HIGH COURT.
LATEST INFORMATION OF COURT HEARING ON 7th JAN 2011
The Hon'ble Magistrate Mr. Amit Bansal Additional City Matropolian Magistrate Patiyala House Court at Newe Delhi has cancelled the bail of Mr. Amit Verma ( Chairman of SOSN) as he could not deposite the
amount which was 10 to 40 cores as ordered by Hon, ble Session Judge Mr. S.P.Garg. In my view it was good because if he had deposited the amount than this money is to be distributed amongst Delhi Investor Only & other investor across India remain kept on waiting waiting & waithing. So my dear friend, s dont waste the time and join hands to fight case in Supreme Court because the verdict given by Hon, ble Supreme court will be a binding on every court if India. Now its upto you?
R.K.NIGAM (m) [protected]
http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/mar/270310-Car-rental-Rupesh-Verma-fraud.htm