Kabya/teamtaurus (Soumita Projects Pvt. Ltd.)

Kabya/teamtaurus (Soumita Projects Pvt. Ltd.) — kabya case status

P

Prudence HB

Feb 17, 2018

Address: North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, 700135

Kabya (Case status)
Reckjoani, rajarhat, kol - 135
(On rs dag no 1268 & 1268/1778)

Fyki, 3 cases pending before the honourable civil judge, 1st court (Sr. Div.), barasat, north 24 pgs.

Ts 579 of 2016
Temporary injunction order :
(Order no 22 date :[protected]

The principle defendant is hereby restrained from creating any 3rd party interest
In the suit property without disclosing and/or mentioning about the pendency of
This litigation in the deed of transfer to be made by the principle defendant in favour
Of the proposed transferees of the suit property and or any portion thereof till the
Disposal of the suit. However it is made clear that the principle defendant may
Complete such construction and may also transfer the same and/or any part thereof
At their won risk but they will not be permitted to claim any equity for such construction subsequently.

Ts 1205 of 2015 :
Ad-interim injunction :
(Initially had ad-interim injunction ordered by hon. Dist. Court, barasat from 06.10.2015 but later
That ad-interim injunction was vacated by hon. 4th adj, barasat. On 18.05.2017)

Hon. Supreme court order dated :[protected]
(Diary no. 29395 of 2017)
http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/case-status

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned
Order passed by the high court.
The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the
Trial of suit no.1205 of 2015.

Temporary injunction : pending (Hearing stage)

Ts 650 of 2015 :
Ad-interim injunction : pending

Was this information helpful?

No (0)

Yes (0)

Comments

L

LawyerTT

from Kolkata, West Bengal

Feb 23, 2018

Half baked news.. In the Special Leave Petition preferred by the plaintiff, she has relied on and/or referred to the order passed by the honourable Civil Judge, 1st Court (Sr. Div) at Barasat, being no. 22 dated 21st April, 2017 in the matter of T.S 579 of 2016 in support of her claim. The honourable Supreme Court after duly taking the said order into consideration vis-à-vis the order dated 19th June, 2017 passed in C.O. No. 1899 of 2017 by honorable Justice Sanjib Banerjee of Kolkata High Court, has been pleased to uphold the later. Therefore no such requirement of disclosing the pendency of the litigation in the deed of transfer to be made by the principal defendant in favour of the proposed transferees of the same suit property and or any portion thereof till the disposal of the suit regarding which the Half baked news. In the Special Leave Petition preferred by the plaintiff, she has relied on and/or referred to the order passed by the honourable Civil Judge, 1st Court (Sr. Div) at Barasat, being no. 22 dated 21st April, 2017 in the matter of T.S 579 of 2016 in support of her claim. The honourable Supreme Court after duly taking the said order into consideration vis-à-vis the order dated 19th June, 2017 passed in C.O. No. 1899 of 2017 by honourable Justice Sanjib Banerjee of Kolkata High Court, has been pleased to uphold the later. Therefore no such requirement of disclosing the pendency of the litigation in the deed of transfer to be made by the principal defendant in favour of the proposed transferees of the same suit property and or any portion thereof till the disposal of the suit regarding which the honourable High Court of Kolkata and honourable Supreme Court of India have already held the observation as mentioned before. High Court of Kolkata and honourable Supreme Court of India have already held the observation as mentioned before.

Reply

L

LawyerTT

from Kolkata, West Bengal

Feb 23, 2018

Half baked news.. In the Special Leave Petition preferred by the plaintiff, she has relied on and/or referred to the order passed by the honourable Civil Judge, 1st Court (Sr. Div) at Barasat, being no. 22 dated 21st April, 2017 in the matter of T.S 579 of 2016 in support of her claim. The honourable Supreme Court after duly taking the said order into consideration vis-à-vis the order dated 19th June, 2017 passed in C.O. No. 1899 of 2017 by honourable Justice Sanjib Banerjee of Kolkata High Court, has been pleased to uphold the later. Therefore no such requirement of disclosing the pendency of the litigation in the deed of transfer to be made by the principal defendant in favour of the proposed transferees of the same suit property and or any portion thereof till the disposal of the suit regarding which the honourable High Court of Kolkata and honourable Supreme Court of India have already held the observation as mentioned before.

Reply