Address: Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, 201301 |
To
The ceo
Noida authority.
Sir,
Para 31 (Iv) of rules – noida-phase ii housing scheme, dated 20/01/1997 of central government employeew welfare housing organisation, presided by the secretary, department o[censored]rban employment and poverty alleviation, ministry o[censored]rban affairs & employment, pronounced, ”facilities like stair-cases, passages, terraces, parks, lifts etc. And common spaces and services, will be utilized by the beneficiary, along with other beneficiaries of the scheme and no one will have exclusive right to their usage, nor make any alterations thereto”
Sub-lease deed pronounced:
Para 12: the third party shall not without the sanction or permission in writing of the lessor erect any building or make any alteration or sub-divide or amalgamate such transferred leased dwelling unit.
Para 14: the second/third party shall not in any manner whatsoever encroach upon the common land area and facilities and services not handed over to them. All unauthorized encroachments made by the second/third party shall be liable to be removed at his cost.
Para 15: the second/third party shall on the determination of the sub-lease of the land, peaceably yield up the said land unto the lessor after removing the super structure within the stipulated period from the land.
Para 16: the allottee has/shall become a member of the kendriya vihar apartment owners association, formed by the lessee for the purpose of maintaining and managing common areas of the flat. In case of any conflict, direction issued/discretion taken by the lessor shall be final.
The hon’ble constitution of india in article 14 pronounced equality before law. And also in article 51a pronounced fundamental duties – it shall be the duty of every citizen of india (A) to enable by the constitution and respect its ideals and institutions...
Above all, the master plan strictly warn not to demolish base wall(S) of building structure for two reasons 1) noida region is earthquake prone; (2) base-wall & supporting beam of a building being its backbone. Yet on 24th may 2009 inmate of flat no.B-566 broke such base wall & supporting beam in between balcony & dining hall to amalgamate balcony in his dining hall. The moment his labor
…2
- 2 -
Started demolishing, i reported the matter in writing immediately to kvaoa office to come & do something. But kvaoa officials did not respond. Hence, the inmate of b-566 not only comfortably demolished base wall but also opened an outdoor & kept about 40-plant-pots all around to encroach entire common space meant for parking of vehicles. This is blatantly illegal.
A passive or even tolerant attitude of kvaoa and the ceo, noida authority on this, encouraged other ground floor allottees as well for such unlawful demolitions and encroachment leaving no place for convenient parking of vehicles among blocks (Acknowledgment no.[protected], no.[protected], no.[protected] refers) so, onus rests with them of panic in upper floor inmate for untoward incidence caused, if any, due to this manmade earthquake hazard.
Gekjs cykwd&14 esa ch&563 ls ch&578 rd 16&vikvzesuv~l gsa ftuds fy, vikvzesuv ch&563 vksj ch&566 ds vkxs 8&8 xkm+h dh lk>k ikfdzx gsa ysfdu ch&566 okys us chp dh nhokj fxjkdj cm+h ckydkwuh vius dejs esa feyk yh gs] mlds vkxs dh dkweu&lisl esa viuk dksvz;kmz cuk fy;k gs vksj mlds vkxs dh txg esa og viuh dkj o eksvjckbd bl rjg ls [km+h djrk gs fd ch&566 ds vkxs dh iwjh txg esa dksbz vu; ldwvj o dkj [km+h u gks ldsa eksds dk eqvk;uk ihlhvkj esa vk, jh vk'kksd dqekj th 23 flrecj dks losjs 9 cts lo;a dj x, gsaa
Vc ge ftlds vikvzesuv ds vkxs hkh viuh dkj [km+h djrs gsa og ;gh pkgrk gs fd ge vius vikvzesuv ds uhps viuh dkj [km+h djsaa ysfdu uhps okyk gesa viuh dkj ugha [km+h djus nsrk] gesa etcwju fdlh u fdlh vikvzesuv ds vkxs viuh dkj [km+h djuh im+rh gs ftlls fp
Was this information helpful?
Post your Comment