Comments
At the outset we at NSB take note of this mail.
The audience (Students and Parents) to whom this mail is addressed, should note the following points.
1. The Heading: (NSB providing Placements)
NSB is a B-School of repute and not a placement agency. It WILL help develop every placement related skill for success of the student during the placement process but cannot provide placement on its own. This is because NSB does not own companies in the corporate world.
2. The Body of the Mail:
a. “Placement Opportunity”
NSB has a dedicated placement cell to aid students to develop their skills. The cell is headed by a placement officer. This is also mentioned by the complainant where he/she says “Bad Corporate Relations Manager”. NSB is extremely cautious about this department and hence removed the non performer in 5 months. Today also the cell exists and we also have a student placement committee. They work tirelessly to support students. Also there is nothing called as “Campus Placement fees” as claimed by the complainant. This is done as a part of responsibility for the student.
The Placement cell works with the academic department to impart the skills required. Placement opportunities are provided to candidates who indulge in learning and have a minimum attendance percentage of 75%. Around 80 eligible candidates of the[protected] batch have been given multiple opportunities to get placed. By reading the complaint, the eligibility of this candidate is in question.
b. Reviews:
It is normal for any institution to sound the external environment on its performance. With the advent of the digital media eWOM (Electronic Word of Mouth) is an accepted practice that institutions adopt. They look at stakeholders to review their performance. This is quite natural and accepted by the entire world. NSB has NEVER influenced any stakeholder on the type of reviews. It is purely left to them to give the reviews. But yes, as a confident and transparent organization, we have always expected good reviews from our students as any grievance is addressed immediately. We work very closely with students and our purpose of existence is their success.
c. Referrals:
It is also normal practice to award someone who helps an organization with referral bonus as it amounts to courtesy. The students who are the true representatives of the institute have every right to refer students to their institute and they NEED to be rewarded for this. By misunderstanding the intention of the review, the complainant has shown his/her own institute in poor light. He/She does not even realize that this will only affect his/her career as readers know how and what to understand from any written message. Also the mails which are tagged are internal mails to the students which should not be publicly posted . This shows the breach of confidentiality.
d. The other facts of the mail:
The complainant who seems to be a marketing student has mentioned that Sales opportunities came to the institution. It should be understood that the sales activity is the fundamental for any marketing job and that should be the starting point. This shows that opportunities came but he/she could not convert them into a job.
The complainant also has said that the institution is “focusing on academics.” This is the fundamental for every educational institution. A student who cares to learn will for sure do well in a placement process.
3. Conclusion:
Looking at this mail, the attitude and the language, it seems that the student has not taken full advantage of the care which NSB provides to each student. Both the language of expression and the understanding of the situation seem below industry standards which is the very reason for his/her low salary offer.
Dr. Sridhara Murthy (and not sridhar murty as the complainant disrespectfully refers to with a wrong spelling) has been running this institution with utmost ethics and with every sense of care for the students. The students of NSB have been working round the world and have exhibited high caliber.
Having said this, even today the student can surface and approach the dedicated placement department of NSB and we are very pleased to provide language, conceptual understanding and placement assistance to him/her.
God bless the student.
The audience (Students and Parents) to whom this mail is addressed, should note the following points.
1. The Heading: (NSB providing Placements)
NSB is a B-School of repute and not a placement agency. It WILL help develop every placement related skill for success of the student during the placement process but cannot provide placement on its own. This is because NSB does not own companies in the corporate world.
2. The Body of the Mail:
a. “Placement Opportunity”
NSB has a dedicated placement cell to aid students to develop their skills. The cell is headed by a placement officer. This is also mentioned by the complainant where he/she says “Bad Corporate Relations Manager”. NSB is extremely cautious about this department and hence removed the non performer in 5 months. Today also the cell exists and we also have a student placement committee. They work tirelessly to support students. Also there is nothing called as “Campus Placement fees” as claimed by the complainant. This is done as a part of responsibility for the student.
The Placement cell works with the academic department to impart the skills required. Placement opportunities are provided to candidates who indulge in learning and have a minimum attendance percentage of 75%. Around 80 eligible candidates of the[protected] batch have been given multiple opportunities to get placed. By reading the complaint, the eligibility of this candidate is in question.
b. Reviews:
It is normal for any institution to sound the external environment on its performance. With the advent of the digital media eWOM (Electronic Word of Mouth) is an accepted practice that institutions adopt. They look at stakeholders to review their performance. This is quite natural and accepted by the entire world. NSB has NEVER influenced any stakeholder on the type of reviews. It is purely left to them to give the reviews. But yes, as a confident and transparent organization, we have always expected good reviews from our students as any grievance is addressed immediately. We work very closely with students and our purpose of existence is their success.
c. Referrals:
It is also normal practice to award someone who helps an organization with referral bonus as it amounts to courtesy. The students who are the true representatives of the institute have every right to refer students to their institute and they NEED to be rewarded for this. By misunderstanding the intention of the review, the complainant has shown his/her own institute in poor light. He/She does not even realize that this will only affect his/her career as readers know how and what to understand from any written message. Also the mails which are tagged are internal mails to the students which should not be publicly posted . This shows the breach of confidentiality.
d. The other facts of the mail:
The complainant who seems to be a marketing student has mentioned that Sales opportunities came to the institution. It should be understood that the sales activity is the fundamental for any marketing job and that should be the starting point. This shows that opportunities came but he/she could not convert them into a job.
The complainant also has said that the institution is “focusing on academics.” This is the fundamental for every educational institution. A student who cares to learn will for sure do well in a placement process.
3. Conclusion:
Looking at this mail, the attitude and the language, it seems that the student has not taken full advantage of the care which NSB provides to each student. Both the language of expression and the understanding of the situation seem below industry standards which is the very reason for his/her low salary offer.
Dr. Sridhara Murthy (and not sridhar murty as the complainant disrespectfully refers to with a wrong spelling) has been running this institution with utmost ethics and with every sense of care for the students. The students of NSB have been working round the world and have exhibited high caliber.
Having said this, even today the student can surface and approach the dedicated placement department of NSB and we are very pleased to provide language, conceptual understanding and placement assistance to him/her.
God bless the student.
bangalorediaries's reply, Nov 23, 2016
1. then why does nsb lie 100% placements in websites and everywhere. always lying. in websites posting names of companies which never came to college. Its a marketing strategy.
2. a.) again lying ... out of 80 eligible candidates how many went on campus.. and how many off campus. stop lying. we students know the truth. we used to even discuss during the placements about the quality of the placements. you are lying because students and parents are reading this so you will lie. we students even attended the meeting where we raised all these questions. Most were eligible for placements but we didnt get placements. there are others students who have written in quora website about the truth about placements.
b.) in the pics it is written clearly to give positive reviews because only 12 reviews are in google so increase the no. of reviews. why will we give good reviews and false info when college didnt provided good placements and lies in website that it is the best for ROI... we did not get ROI. we invested in mba studies to get ROI. and everyone mostly has given 5 stars everywhere... nsb is not that great that its 5 stars.we know the reality. and reviews are written after people graduate not immediately after joining. its a marketing strategy because these reviews are shown in websites to marketing strategy. that is corrupt fraud practice. students havent completed 2 years and you are taking reviews before. we were not satisfied so many of us didnot review. we know the reality.
c. its a marketing strtategy . mails are not confidential. we expected ROI. because you promised ROI before joining. you said its one of the best colleges for ROI. put names of companies in website that never came.
d. other colleges provide proper marketing jobs and not sales jobs with very low salaries. we cant speak good english like you so dont keep lying. you are saying because you provided only sales jobs. we invested money in education not just for academics but for ROI. we didnt get ROI. all students know about this and the fake promises management made. we students were very stressed.
3. what care did nsb provide .we wrote because our seniors also wrote the same thing here. you lied to seniors also. and if you say we were not fit for placements then why did you admit us in nsb. we could have invested money in some other college. you admitted us because you were selling seats just like seniors said. we are not disrespecting. we expected Roi which you promised . it is your duty. you cant blame us or our behavour. whatever reply you gave is total lies. you can speak good english, we cant . stop lying. and its not that our english is so poor that we cant get decent jobs. but the jobs you provided, we could get it directly from naukri.com then what was the point. if you want better students improve the quality of intake. why did you admit us. because you wanted to sell seats by making fake promises .
2. a.) again lying ... out of 80 eligible candidates how many went on campus.. and how many off campus. stop lying. we students know the truth. we used to even discuss during the placements about the quality of the placements. you are lying because students and parents are reading this so you will lie. we students even attended the meeting where we raised all these questions. Most were eligible for placements but we didnt get placements. there are others students who have written in quora website about the truth about placements.
b.) in the pics it is written clearly to give positive reviews because only 12 reviews are in google so increase the no. of reviews. why will we give good reviews and false info when college didnt provided good placements and lies in website that it is the best for ROI... we did not get ROI. we invested in mba studies to get ROI. and everyone mostly has given 5 stars everywhere... nsb is not that great that its 5 stars.we know the reality. and reviews are written after people graduate not immediately after joining. its a marketing strategy because these reviews are shown in websites to marketing strategy. that is corrupt fraud practice. students havent completed 2 years and you are taking reviews before. we were not satisfied so many of us didnot review. we know the reality.
c. its a marketing strtategy . mails are not confidential. we expected ROI. because you promised ROI before joining. you said its one of the best colleges for ROI. put names of companies in website that never came.
d. other colleges provide proper marketing jobs and not sales jobs with very low salaries. we cant speak good english like you so dont keep lying. you are saying because you provided only sales jobs. we invested money in education not just for academics but for ROI. we didnt get ROI. all students know about this and the fake promises management made. we students were very stressed.
3. what care did nsb provide .we wrote because our seniors also wrote the same thing here. you lied to seniors also. and if you say we were not fit for placements then why did you admit us in nsb. we could have invested money in some other college. you admitted us because you were selling seats just like seniors said. we are not disrespecting. we expected Roi which you promised . it is your duty. you cant blame us or our behavour. whatever reply you gave is total lies. you can speak good english, we cant . stop lying. and its not that our english is so poor that we cant get decent jobs. but the jobs you provided, we could get it directly from naukri.com then what was the point. if you want better students improve the quality of intake. why did you admit us. because you wanted to sell seats by making fake promises .
bangalorediaries's reply, Nov 23, 2016
When seniors wrote complaint here you lied that they are not students of nsb but a competing institution has written. we are sure that if we didnot put pictures then you will say the same thing that we are not nsb students but from competing institution. But now that we have put pictures you have to accept the truth. we can put many more pics. so you are now blaming us and our behaviour saying that we are disrespecting and lying that we were not eligible. we were of course eligible. we even attended the meeting. management is lying. we didnot get Roi.
bangalorediaries's reply, Nov 23, 2016
In google reviews management made fake google accounts and given fake positive reviews and even liked those positive reviews..some have 34 likes ...to misguide readers that there are many real students who are satisfied with nsb so that you can sell more and more seats and cheat the public like you cheated us and our seniors...in response to negative reviews that outsiders have given. They have themselves liked those google reviews. In google reviews also you have written a competing institution has written negative reviews just like you wrote for seniors. In shiksha.com you have given false answers to questions to misguide the candidate. You have said average salary is 4.3 lak, and you have asked a junior to write these fake information. where 4.3 lak?. not even 3 lak highest . We used to discuss in hindi during placemnts Prof. Murthy sharafat ka mukhota pehen ke logo ko bewakoof banata hai.
Students and Teachers please check the 3 pictures of Google reviews -
1. a.) Jhanavi S is a fake google account that management has made to cheat the public. see what Jhanavi S has written, her friend is from nsb but Her nsb friend didnot review ??????
b.)Utkarsh Sinha is junior. He wrote one year ago. He hasnot passed out. He entered nsb and gave a review immediately. He immediately found the experience awesome !!! ofcourse management pressured Utkarsh. He has got 24 likes. Who gave 24 likes?? Management only gave 24 likes to fool the public and viewers.
2. a.) Ann Mathew is again a fake google account. Management is trying to cheat the public and viewers . Ann Mathew is talking about France exchange program because management wants to attract candidates and sell seats by advertising their france exchange program. Ann Mathew got 31 likes. Who gave 31 likes ????? Management only gave 31 likes to fool the public and viewers.
b.) The response that management has given to Vamsi Teja is totally a big lie. Management has responded 'NSB also has a quality check and we randomly record the conversations (like any other counselling centre) for training purposes.' This is a fake information. We students know that there is no recording done, no quality check done.
3. a.) Srichit Krishna is again a fake google account. Whatever srichit krishna is saying is fake information. And Srichit Krishna has got 34 likes ... in 2 weeks how can anyone get 34 likes ??????? Management has made fake accounts and given fake 'likes' to misguide viewers. So that they can sell seats and do business by fooling viewers. Viewers will foolishly think that real people have given reviews and likes. but we students know the reality.
b.) Shreyas Patil is super-junior . He just joined nsb in 2016. He just joined and gave 5 stars!!! His syllabus has just started. So management is pressuring students to give good google reviews and making fake accounts to fool the public. students are falling in the trap thinking college will do something. These students will definitely not get ROI because We didnot get ROI.
So Students and Parents please be careful of whatever they say in google or their websites. Please read what even our seniors had written. The management is doing fraud practices.
1. a.) Jhanavi S is a fake google account that management has made to cheat the public. see what Jhanavi S has written, her friend is from nsb but Her nsb friend didnot review ??????
b.)Utkarsh Sinha is junior. He wrote one year ago. He hasnot passed out. He entered nsb and gave a review immediately. He immediately found the experience awesome !!! ofcourse management pressured Utkarsh. He has got 24 likes. Who gave 24 likes?? Management only gave 24 likes to fool the public and viewers.
2. a.) Ann Mathew is again a fake google account. Management is trying to cheat the public and viewers . Ann Mathew is talking about France exchange program because management wants to attract candidates and sell seats by advertising their france exchange program. Ann Mathew got 31 likes. Who gave 31 likes ????? Management only gave 31 likes to fool the public and viewers.
b.) The response that management has given to Vamsi Teja is totally a big lie. Management has responded 'NSB also has a quality check and we randomly record the conversations (like any other counselling centre) for training purposes.' This is a fake information. We students know that there is no recording done, no quality check done.
3. a.) Srichit Krishna is again a fake google account. Whatever srichit krishna is saying is fake information. And Srichit Krishna has got 34 likes ... in 2 weeks how can anyone get 34 likes ??????? Management has made fake accounts and given fake 'likes' to misguide viewers. So that they can sell seats and do business by fooling viewers. Viewers will foolishly think that real people have given reviews and likes. but we students know the reality.
b.) Shreyas Patil is super-junior . He just joined nsb in 2016. He just joined and gave 5 stars!!! His syllabus has just started. So management is pressuring students to give good google reviews and making fake accounts to fool the public. students are falling in the trap thinking college will do something. These students will definitely not get ROI because We didnot get ROI.
So Students and Parents please be careful of whatever they say in google or their websites. Please read what even our seniors had written. The management is doing fraud practices.
Dear Students and Parents, please visit this link:
http://www.consumercomplaints.in/nsbindiaorg-national-school-of-business-provide...⇄
http://www.consumercomplaints.in/nsbindiaorg-national-school-of-business-provide...⇄
Prof. Sridhar murthy is a fraud. Since he has a degree from America and can speak English nicely he knows public is foolish and will believe the lies he speaks in good English. He has recently proposed a new campus for nsb. That was in response to what the student has revealed the truth about nsb in quora.. nsb doesn't have sufficient funds to give proper hostel facilities. How can nsb give such a big campus? So plz don't believe anything that Prof. Sridhar Murthy says in any of the websites until and unless they do it in reality. Don't believe nsb website or shiksha website or videos. All Google reviews, just dial reviews, facebook reviews and shiksha reviews are fake . We received email from administration to write positive reviews which we have shown above. They are written by those students who were pressured by Prof. Sridhar Murthy and who are fools thinking college will do something for them. And who want to impress Prof. Sridhar Murthy . College is selling seats and doing business. They want to sell more And more seats to any kind of students.
If you ignore what's written here and fooled by reviews written in other places like Google or Facebook or shiksha then you will be wasting money and 2 years of your life in nsb. You can visit Nsb and check the reality if you don't believe in us.
If you ignore what's written here and fooled by reviews written in other places like Google or Facebook or shiksha then you will be wasting money and 2 years of your life in nsb. You can visit Nsb and check the reality if you don't believe in us.
In google review they have made a fake google account Srichit Krishna. They have put a display pic of sri krishna to misguide viewers that it is a 'Real Account' by putting the display pic.. Dont get fooled that it is a real account. It is actually a fake account. And whatever is saying is also fake. Management is trying to misguide the viewers that there is an external agency that is satisfied with nsb and more than 30 people have liked it to create a fake impression that nsb is a very great college and an external agency has found its faculty student connect to be good. dont get fooled by this trap. There are no external agency who come to nsb to check the faculty student connect. we students know the truth. They have made this fake google account because there are students in quora and here in consumercomplaints who have revealed the reality. So they are trying to put fake information to the public so that students get fooled and they can sell more and more seats.
Another corrupt practice by sridhar murthy, in Quora Prof. Sridhar Murthy has made a fake account of someone with name 'Saravanan' who studied in some Dr. C.V.Raman University . This account was made yesterday on 5th December 2016 only. And in that This FAKE identity 'Saravanan' who hasn't studied in NSB at all like we have studied says that NSB is a great college and it was listed in 'FORBES 2016 Great B-Schools List' and Shiksha reviews are trustworthy because shiksha.com verifies users. This is a FAKE account made by Sridhar Murthy himself who is cunningly trying to show to the outside world before admissions of 2017 that look here is an outside student who is interested in NSB, he has made a judgement in favour of NSB. Actually it is Sridhar Murthy who has made this FAKE Quora Account. So join NSB. This is sridhar murthy's cunning and corrupt practice. Making FAKE accounts in Google, making FAKE accounts in Quora. They made a FAKE google account named as Srichit Krishna. Now they have removed it.
Check the link of Quora question What was the Review of National School of Business? ---
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-review-of-National-School-of-Business-in-Bang...⇄
Dear Students and Parents, Plz be very very careful. This is a FAKE Quora account 'Saravanan'. Because we students know that FORBES 2016 Great B-School List was something where colleges themselves gave their names. Yes, Sridhar Murthy himself submitted the name of NSB. FORBES did not contact NSB. So if you give your college name and multiple other colleges which are better than NSB don't give their names(because they don't care) then of course NSB name will come in the list, that doesnt mean NSB is a great B-School because we are real students who know the reality. And we dont want others to suffer what we suffered. And also all these magazines and rating agencies are PAID MONEY by the respective colleges to give higher rank as a part of their marketing strategy. So Sridhar Murthy PAID to FORBES, PAID to Pioneer and other magazines to give a good ranking which sridhar murthy will show in NSB website as a part of their marketing strategy. Even the magazine company will benefit because they can sell their magazines to these college libraries and increase their market presence.
Shiksha.com verifies users but during verification anyone can give fake information. Shiksha.com can't make out. And Shiksha.com will not send the police to check if the user actually exists or not. Plus the information and answers given in shiksha.com can definitely be wrongly given. Shiksha.com will not verify whether NSB placement gave 4.3 average salary or not which is totally false, we didn't even get 3 lakhs average. So Sridhar Murthy is trying to fool the public by showing that shiksha.com is reliable which is totally wrong because shiksha.com doesn't check the information. You can give fake information after joining shiksha.com. That is what NSB has done. Don't fall in the trap that shiksha.com is reliable. It is NOT. Plus how does Shiksha.com earn money?????? Think about this. There is a business agreement between shiksha.com and various colleges. Various colleges use shiksha.com platform as a advertising medium and that's how shiksha.com earns revenue from colleges.So how can Shiksha.com be reliable when college has PAID MONEY to Shiksha.com to advertize the college. Shiksha.com is NOT police or any law or court. We are marketing students, we studied these in marketing class. So Sridhar Murthy can't fool us.
Students and Parents plz be very very careful of Sridhar Murthy. He is trying his best to fool public by making FAKE accounts everywhere. Sridhar Murthy should be taken to police.
Check the link of Quora question What was the Review of National School of Business? ---
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-review-of-National-School-of-Business-in-Bang...⇄
Dear Students and Parents, Plz be very very careful. This is a FAKE Quora account 'Saravanan'. Because we students know that FORBES 2016 Great B-School List was something where colleges themselves gave their names. Yes, Sridhar Murthy himself submitted the name of NSB. FORBES did not contact NSB. So if you give your college name and multiple other colleges which are better than NSB don't give their names(because they don't care) then of course NSB name will come in the list, that doesnt mean NSB is a great B-School because we are real students who know the reality. And we dont want others to suffer what we suffered. And also all these magazines and rating agencies are PAID MONEY by the respective colleges to give higher rank as a part of their marketing strategy. So Sridhar Murthy PAID to FORBES, PAID to Pioneer and other magazines to give a good ranking which sridhar murthy will show in NSB website as a part of their marketing strategy. Even the magazine company will benefit because they can sell their magazines to these college libraries and increase their market presence.
Shiksha.com verifies users but during verification anyone can give fake information. Shiksha.com can't make out. And Shiksha.com will not send the police to check if the user actually exists or not. Plus the information and answers given in shiksha.com can definitely be wrongly given. Shiksha.com will not verify whether NSB placement gave 4.3 average salary or not which is totally false, we didn't even get 3 lakhs average. So Sridhar Murthy is trying to fool the public by showing that shiksha.com is reliable which is totally wrong because shiksha.com doesn't check the information. You can give fake information after joining shiksha.com. That is what NSB has done. Don't fall in the trap that shiksha.com is reliable. It is NOT. Plus how does Shiksha.com earn money?????? Think about this. There is a business agreement between shiksha.com and various colleges. Various colleges use shiksha.com platform as a advertising medium and that's how shiksha.com earns revenue from colleges.So how can Shiksha.com be reliable when college has PAID MONEY to Shiksha.com to advertize the college. Shiksha.com is NOT police or any law or court. We are marketing students, we studied these in marketing class. So Sridhar Murthy can't fool us.
Students and Parents plz be very very careful of Sridhar Murthy. He is trying his best to fool public by making FAKE accounts everywhere. Sridhar Murthy should be taken to police.
National School of Business never featured in Forbes, it featured in a supplement(named Marqee) of Forbes India NOT Forbes USA . This supplement of Forbes India is specifically a ‘Marketing Initiative’ as which Forbes India themselves say. National School of Business was invited to nominate their own name for the listing. This listing wasn’t a result of serious inspection and audit of National School of Business’s processes by Forbes India. Team from Forbes India never visited any college including National School of Business. Instead they asked colleges to send in their names in order that their names feature in the List as part of the respective college’s ‘Marketing opportunity’ . Hence it is false that Forbes must have given a ‘serious thought’ before listing the name of National School of Business which the FAKE Quora Account name 'Saravanan' says. Actually it is Prof. Sridhar Murthy only who has made this FAKE Quora Account 'Saravanan' and through this FAKE name trying to advertize college. Students and Parents plz be very very careful. You will think it is a 'REAL' person who is interested in National School of Business but it is actually 'FAKE' made by sridhar murthy only to misguide people.
Also the FAKE Quora Account name 'Saravanan' says Forbes BUT actually it is Forbes India and not even Forbes India BUT a supplement of Forbes India named Marquee Supplement which is a ‘marketing initiative’ of Forbes India. They are purposefully saying Forbes so that they can cheat the public that it is Forbes USA but it is actually a supplement of Forbes India named Marquee Supplement not even Forbes India. If you want proof you can check in google.
Also if many colleges better than NSB didnot nominate because they dont care then of course NSB name will feature. That doesnt mean NSB is great.
Prof. Sridhar Murthy is a fraud. He should be taken to police and imprisoned.
Also the FAKE Quora Account name 'Saravanan' says Forbes BUT actually it is Forbes India and not even Forbes India BUT a supplement of Forbes India named Marquee Supplement which is a ‘marketing initiative’ of Forbes India. They are purposefully saying Forbes so that they can cheat the public that it is Forbes USA but it is actually a supplement of Forbes India named Marquee Supplement not even Forbes India. If you want proof you can check in google.
Also if many colleges better than NSB didnot nominate because they dont care then of course NSB name will feature. That doesnt mean NSB is great.
Prof. Sridhar Murthy is a fraud. He should be taken to police and imprisoned.
Prof. Sridhar Murthy has now cunningly removed the FAKE Quora Account 'Saravanan' answer after we here in consumercomplaints revealed the reality just like he removed FAKE Google account review 'Srichit Krishna' .
Prof. Sridhar Murthy has asked Soumita kundu to give a positive review of nsb. Whatever soumita kundu has written is biased and applies only to her because soumita kundu was favoured by college and they showed high level partiality to soumita kundu. But what she has written about placement cell is totally wrong because we didnot get ROI. She is not the only student who studied in college. We are also students.
But yes she is right when she said some professors are knowledgeable ... but sridhar murthy is not in that list of professors. Because he has ego and he drama master. doesnt allow anyone to give valid point.
But yes she is right when she said some professors are knowledgeable ... but sridhar murthy is not in that list of professors. Because he has ego and he drama master. doesnt allow anyone to give valid point.
Soumita kundu by writing false information has become a corrupt manager just like her corrupt mentor sridhar murthy
Now Soumita Kundu has removed her review after we revealed here that she is lying and that she is corrupt. But we can upload the pic of Soumita Kundu's review. So she can't lie that she had never written false review of national school of business, a student doing fraud practice for a fraud mentor Sridhar murthy.
Now again they have made a fake account of someone Maria Luther who has given a 5 star in Google reviews. By reading what This FAKE identity has written it is very clear that it is a FAKE identity and it written by an Indian and not a foreigner . It is actually Sridhar murthy only who is trying to show that nsb has international connections. This FAKE identity has written that every student is given chance to go for Student exchange program. This statement itself shows that the intention behind writing this review was to tell outsiders about student exchange program and advertise college by mentioning about student exchange program. It is a total lie a big big lie that every student is given chance to go for Student exchange program. Only 7-8 students out of 150 students are given chance and it is NOT free at all. Please be very careful when they lie about the student exchange program.
In Facebook they have made a account Maxim Luther NOT Maria Luther (in Google it is Maria Luther) and given a positive review of national school of business. Please be very careful when you see foreign names. They are FAKE accounts to misguide students and parents that Nsb is such a great college that it has international connections. All this is FAKE. You can visit Nsb and see the reality. It doesn't have a good building and good hostel sridhar murthy is talking big about international connections.
Sridhar murthy should be publicly kicked and taken to the police and put in jail.
In Facebook they have made a account Maxim Luther NOT Maria Luther (in Google it is Maria Luther) and given a positive review of national school of business. Please be very careful when you see foreign names. They are FAKE accounts to misguide students and parents that Nsb is such a great college that it has international connections. All this is FAKE. You can visit Nsb and see the reality. It doesn't have a good building and good hostel sridhar murthy is talking big about international connections.
Sridhar murthy should be publicly kicked and taken to the police and put in jail.
And this FAKE identity Maria Luther says that if you don't do 'drama' but 'work determinedly' then you will not face problems at all. This statement shows that the person is a FAKE identity Maria Luther.
Actually it is Sridhar murthy only writing making FAKE FAKE accounts everywhere and putting FAKE FAKE photos.
Because there are so many people in Quora and here in consumercomplaints who has revealed truth here, Sridhar murthy is trying to show to the outside world that we all were doing drama and not working when the truth is that we were cheated by Sridhar Murthy and we did not get ROI...sridhar murthy through this FAKE account is trying to misguide students and parents that Our complaints should not be taken seriously but this FAKE identity Maria Luther s review is correct.
The truth is that it is Sridhar murthy who is a drama master. It is he who cheats everyone by making FAKE FAKE accounts everywhere and putting FAKE FAKE information everywhere.
Actually it is Sridhar murthy only writing making FAKE FAKE accounts everywhere and putting FAKE FAKE photos.
Because there are so many people in Quora and here in consumercomplaints who has revealed truth here, Sridhar murthy is trying to show to the outside world that we all were doing drama and not working when the truth is that we were cheated by Sridhar Murthy and we did not get ROI...sridhar murthy through this FAKE account is trying to misguide students and parents that Our complaints should not be taken seriously but this FAKE identity Maria Luther s review is correct.
The truth is that it is Sridhar murthy who is a drama master. It is he who cheats everyone by making FAKE FAKE accounts everywhere and putting FAKE FAKE information everywhere.
And the last sentence this FAKE identity Maria Luther says 'I don't think you should take anyone's advice but see yourself ' . This statement is proof that the account is a FAKE Google account. Why shouldn't students and parents take advice of students who studied in nsb . Everyone talks to seniors. This is proof that Sridhar murthy wants people to ignore our complaints by making FAKE account Maria Luther. He is a big big bas. In that way he can sell more and more seats to candidates.
The FAKE accounts in Google are made by an ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY in Delhi run by a person named Mr. Mukesh. He even has a Youtube channel. What Proff Sridhr Murty has done is that he has OUTSOURCED the job of making FAKE Google Accounts to this company. We have informed Google and Facebook Administration and they have removed one FAKE facebook account Maxim Luther and you can check in Google that Maria Luther's Display Pic is cut off . This means that Google has identified Maria Luther as a FAKE Account giving FAKE Review. They have been caught. And so is Sridhar Murthy. Yes Sridhar Murhty is a big liar and a corrupt person. and it is not surprising that he is doing all these cheap things of PAYING MONEY to a THIRD PARTY COMPANY to make FAKE Google Accounts and FAKE Facebook Accounts. He will not spend any money to improve the QUALITY of the college. He will not spend money to improve PLACEMENTS, FACULTIES, HOSTEL FACILITIES but he will waste STUDENT's MONEY for making FAKE Google Account and FAKE Facebook Account and give that PRECIOUS HARD-EARNED MONEY of STUDENT's PARENTS to a FRAUD ONLINE REPUTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY.
Juniors are gone.
Juniors are gone.
Customer satisfaction rating Customer satisfaction rating is a complex algorithm that helps our users determine how good
a company is at responding and resolving complaints by granting from 1 to 5 stars for each
complaint and then ultimately combining them all for an overall score.
Read more
Read more
20%
Complaints
15
Pending
0
Resolved
3
+91 80 3025 1440
#33, 22nd Main, 1st Cross, 2nd Phase, JP Nagar, Bangalore, Bangalore, Karnataka, India - 560078
Dear students and parents,
We are students of national school of business, JP Nagar, Bangalore. Before we joined this college we were made big big fake promises that we will get good placements. But we didn’t get good placements at all. We got very very bad placements. We regret to done our mba from this college. They said they will give good return on investment. After spending almost 6-7 lakkh including hostel fees and fooding we didn’t get even 3 lakhs salary. Only sales, sales and sales job s were offered. Even rank holders went off campus. That Prof Sridhar Murty lied about placements that they will give best placements but now we feel cheated and regret our decision to join NSB. They even took good reviews from us in social media and we thought that will help us but nothing happened. We have uploaded the photos of mails that Director parthasarathi and President sridhar Murty sent us. Please see them. We thought it will help us only so we gave good reviews on Google and other places but instead they don’t cared for our placements. We went off campus and we were stressed. We should not have joined this college as it’s a complete waste of money. The fees included campus placements fees also. No return on investment but they lied in their website that they are one of the best colleges in Bangalore with good ROI. We got lower salaries off campus. And they don’t have good Industry connections. They were forwarding openings that already came in job portals like naukri. So what’s point in campus placements. We can directly go through job portals. Students and parents please be careful of what they say in websites. They lied everywhere. Many students will not reveal the truth. But we thought we were cheated by college that’s why telling other. our seniors also wrote complaint in this site before so we also write. only big big talks and fake promises. They took money and didn’t do what they should do and now they are lying to juniors that seniors had good placements when it is total lie. The companies they have listed didn’t come for placements. Internships also some people did on their own. Prof sridhar Murty lies that college has best Industry connections. They brought a very bad corporate relations manager who himself didn’t know how to create Industry connect. When they removed him it was already late and damage was done. They doing only business. Only focussing on academics and no practical placements. They do business. And since Prof. Sridhar Murty has a degree from America and can speak good English which others can’t he can fool people by talking and many people fall into his trap. He has recently proposed a new campus for NSB, the government attitude that is there at NSB it will be long before they shift to new campus but they told before only as a marketing strategy to sell more and more seats. Moreover the college has to first get sufficient funding. They are doing only business.
The audience (Students and Parents) to whom this mail is addressed, should note the following points.
1. The Heading: (NSB providing Placements)
NSB is a B-School of repute and not a placement agency. It WILL help develop every placement related skill for success of the student during the placement process but cannot provide placement on its own. This is because NSB does not own companies in the corporate world.
2. The Body of the Mail:
a. “Placement Opportunity”
NSB has a dedicated placement cell to aid students to develop their skills. The cell is headed by a placement officer. This is also mentioned by the complainant where he/she says “Bad Corporate Relations Manager”. NSB is extremely cautious about this department and hence removed the non performer in 5 months. Today also the cell exists and we also have a student placement committee. They work tirelessly to support students. Also there is nothing called as “Campus Placement fees” as claimed by the complainant. This is done as a part of responsibility for the student.
The Placement cell works with the academic department to impart the skills required. Placement opportunities are provided to candidates who indulge in learning and have a minimum attendance percentage of 75%. Around 80 eligible candidates of the 2014-2016 batch have been given multiple opportunities to get placed. By reading the complaint, the eligibility of this candidate is in question.
b. Reviews:
It is normal for any institution to sound the external environment on its performance. With the advent of the digital media eWOM (Electronic Word of Mouth) is an accepted practice that institutions adopt. They look at stakeholders to review their performance. This is quite natural and accepted by the entire world. NSB has NEVER influenced any stakeholder on the type of reviews. It is purely left to them to give the reviews. But yes, as a confident and transparent organization, we have always expected good reviews from our students as any grievance is addressed immediately. We work very closely with students and our purpose of existence is their success.
c. Referrals:
It is also normal practice to award someone who helps an organization with referral bonus as it amounts to courtesy. The students who are the true representatives of the institute have every right to refer students to their institute and they NEED to be rewarded for this. By misunderstanding the intention of the review, the complainant has shown his/her own institute in poor light. He/She does not even realize that this will only affect his/her career as readers know how and what to understand from any written message. Also the mails which are tagged are internal mails to the students which should not be publicly posted . This shows the breach of confidentiality.
d. The other facts of the mail:
The complainant who seems to be a marketing student has mentioned that Sales opportunities came to the institution. It should be understood that the sales activity is the fundamental for any marketing job and that should be the starting point. This shows that opportunities came but he/she could not convert them into a job.
The complainant also has said that the institution is “focusing on academics.” This is the fundamental for every educational institution. A student who cares to learn will for sure do well in a placement process.
3. Conclusion:
Looking at this mail, the attitude and the language, it seems that the student has not taken full advantage of the care which NSB provides to each student. Both the language of expression and the understanding of the situation seem below industry standards which is the very reason for his/her low salary offer.
Dr. Sridhara Murthy (and not sridhar murty as the complainant disrespectfully refers to with a wrong spelling) has been running this institution with utmost ethics and with every sense of care for the students. The students of NSB have been working round the world and have exhibited high caliber.
Having said this, even today the student can surface and approach the dedicated placement department of NSB and we are very pleased to provide language, conceptual understanding and placement assistance to him/her.
God bless the student.
The audience (Students and Parents) to whom this mail is addressed, should note the following points.
1. The Heading: (NSB providing Placements)
NSB is a B-School of repute and not a placement agency. It WILL help develop every placement related skill for success of the student during the placement process but cannot provide placement on its own. This is because NSB does not own companies in the corporate world.
2. The Body of the Mail:
a. “Placement Opportunity”
NSB has a dedicated placement cell to aid students to develop their skills. The cell is headed by a placement officer. This is also mentioned by the complainant where he/she says “Bad Corporate Relations Manager”. NSB is extremely cautious about this department and hence removed the non performer in 5 months. Today also the cell exists and we also have a student placement committee. They work tirelessly to support students. Also there is nothing called as “Campus Placement fees” as claimed by the complainant. This is done as a part of responsibility for the student.
The Placement cell works with the academic department to impart the skills required. Placement opportunities are provided to candidates who indulge in learning and have a minimum attendance percentage of 75%. Around 80 eligible candidates of the 2014-2016 batch have been given multiple opportunities to get placed. By reading the complaint, the eligibility of this candidate is in question.
b. Reviews:
It is normal for any institution to sound the external environment on its performance. With the advent of the digital media eWOM (Electronic Word of Mouth) is an accepted practice that institutions adopt. They look at stakeholders to review their performance. This is quite natural and accepted by the entire world. NSB has NEVER influenced any stakeholder on the type of reviews. It is purely left to them to give the reviews. But yes, as a confident and transparent organization, we have always expected good reviews from our students as any grievance is addressed immediately. We work very closely with students and our purpose of existence is their success.
c. Referrals:
It is also normal practice to award someone who helps an organization with referral bonus as it amounts to courtesy. The students who are the true representatives of the institute have every right to refer students to their institute and they NEED to be rewarded for this. By misunderstanding the intention of the review, the complainant has shown his/her own institute in poor light. He/She does not even realize that this will only affect his/her career as readers know how and what to understand from any written message. Also the mails which are tagged are internal mails to the students which should not be publicly posted . This shows the breach of confidentiality.
d. The other facts of the mail:
The complainant who seems to be a marketing student has mentioned that Sales opportunities came to the institution. It should be understood that the sales activity is the fundamental for any marketing job and that should be the starting point. This shows that opportunities came but he/she could not convert them into a job.
The complainant also has said that the institution is “focusing on academics.” This is the fundamental for every educational institution. A student who cares to learn will for sure do well in a placement process.
3. Conclusion:
Looking at this mail, the attitude and the language, it seems that the student has not taken full advantage of the care which NSB provides to each student. Both the language of expression and the understanding of the situation seem below industry standards which is the very reason for his/her low salary offer.
Dr. Sridhara Murthy (and not sridhar murty as the complainant disrespectfully refers to with a wrong spelling) has been running this institution with utmost ethics and with every sense of care for the students. The students of NSB have been working round the world and have exhibited high caliber.
Having said this, even today the student can surface and approach the dedicated placement department of NSB and we are very pleased to provide language, conceptual understanding and placement assistance to him/her.
God bless the student.